Thursday, May 10, 2007

Another warship to moon the Iranian coastline

Bush and Cheney don't give up, do they?

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
Today, the Nimitz is rapidly approaching the Persian Gulf, where it will join two other U.S. aircraft carriers and the French carrier Charles De Gaulle in the largest concentration of naval firepower in the region since the launching of the U.S. invasion of Iraq four years ago.

Why this concentration now? Officially, the Nimitz is on its way to the Gulf to replace the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower, which is due to return to the United States for crew leave and ship maintenance after months on station. But the U.S. Central Command (Centcom), which exercises command authority over all U.S. forces in the Persian Gulf area, refuses to say when the Eisenhower will actually depart—or even when the Nimitz will arrive.

For a time, at least, the United States will have three carrier battle groups in the region. The USS John C. Stennis is the third. Each carrier is accompanied by a small flotilla of cruisers, destroyers, submarines, and support vessels, many equipped with Tomahawk land-attack cruise missiles (TLAMs). Minimally, this gives modern meaning to the classic imperial term "gunboat diplomacy," which makes it all the stranger that the deployment of the Nimitz is covered in our media, if at all, as the most minor of news stories. And when the Nimitz sailed off into the Pacific last month on its way to the Gulf, it simply disappeared off media radar screens like some classic "lost patrol."

Rest assured, unlike us, the Iranians have noticed. After all, with the arrival of the Nimitz battle group, the Bush administration will be—for an unknown period of time—in an optimal position to strike Iran with a punishing array of bombs and missiles should the President decide to carry out his oft-repeated threat to eliminate Iran's nuclear program through military action. "All options," as the administration loves to say, remain ominously "on the table."

We are soooo ready to start something. Wonder what the excuse for bombing Iran will be this time?

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

The next step in provocation is for some ships to enter "disputed" waters and "defend" themselves against incoming PT boats.

ellroon said...

The fact that Cheney is still keeping (and torturing?) the 5 Iranian diplomats says it all. They so want something... anything.. to give them cause to bomb Iran.

I wonder how Britian held them off long enough to get their sailors out of Iran....

Steve Bates said...

This is scary. As the fired US Attorneys story tightens around the White House, Bush and Cheney would do literally anything to distract us all. Nothing is too extreme for them; no cost is too great for the rest of us and the rest of the world... to pay to save their sorry butts. Under the circumstances, they may not even bother with excuses or elaborate displays as they did before attacking Iraq. "Because I said so" has become the reason of choice for the Shrub and his henchmen.

I am trying hard not to think about pretzels and Segways. Impeachment, that's the ticket... impeachment, conviction, removal from office, war crimes charges before an international tribunal, conviction... and prison, under conditions more humane than these (expletive deleted)s ever allowed to "enemy combatants."

ellroon said...

Aww. I wanted Bush and Cheney to discover first hand the joys of Gitmo and the destruction of habeas corpus and the Geneva Convention...

You know, those who live by destruction and evil shall die by destruction and evil?