Saturday, May 26, 2007

Monica's blue blue dress...

Goodling's that is. Greg Palast at the Brad Blog points out the committee missed the most amazing confession and link to a crime during Monica Goodling's testimony:
This Monica revealed something hotter --- much hotter --- than a stained blue dress. In her opening testimony yesterday before the House Judiciary Committee, Monica Goodling, the blonde-ling underling to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and Department of Justice Liaison to the White House, dropped The Big One....And the Committee members didn't even know it.

Goodling testified that Gonzales' Chief of Staff, Kyle Sampson, perjured himself, lying to the committee in earlier testimony. The lie: Sampson denied Monica had told him about Tim Griffin's "involvement in 'caging' voters" in 2004.

[snip]

Here's how caging worked, and along with Griffin's thoughtful emails themselves you'll understand it all in no time.

The Bush-Cheney operatives sent hundreds of thousands of letters marked "Do not forward" to voters' homes. Letters returned ("caged") were used as evidence to block these voters' right to cast a ballot on grounds they were registered at phony addresses. Who were the evil fakers? Homeless men, students on vacation and --- you got to love this --- American soldiers. Oh yeah: most of them are Black voters.

Why weren't these African-American voters home when the Republican letters arrived? The homeless men were on park benches, the students were on vacation --- and the soldiers were overseas. Go to Baghdad, lose your vote. Mission Accomplished.

How do I know? I have the caging lists...

I have them because they are attached to the emails Rove insists can't be found. I have the emails. 500 of them --- sent to our team at BBC after the Rove-bots accidentally sent them to a web domain owned by our friend John Wooden.

Here's what you need to know --- and the Committee would have discovered, if only they'd asked:

  1. 'Caging' voters is a crime, a go-to-jail felony.
  2. Griffin wasn't "involved" in the caging, Ms. Goodling. Griffin, Rove's right-hand man (right-hand claw), was directing the illegal purge and challenge campaign. How do I know? It's in the email I got. Thanks. And it's posted below.
  3. On December 7, 2006, the ragin', cagin' Griffin was named, on Rove's personal demand, US Attorney for Arkansas. Perpetrator became prosecutor.

The committee was perplexed about Monica's panicked admission and accusations about the caging list because the US press never covered it. That's because, as Griffin wrote to Goodling in yet another email (dated February 6 of this year, and also posted below), their caging operation only made the news on BBC London: busted open, Griffin bitched, by that "British reporter," Greg Palast.

Ask the questions, Congress! Palast has written it all down for you if you are brave enough to use them. Go and look at his evidence.

Monica's clothes were actually more black than blue, but anyway....

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

4 comments:

Steve Bates said...

Jeebus.

Palast's Democracy Now videos back on the 5/14 Brad Blog post are enough to take one's breath away.

I knew the "missing" Rove emails would eventually be located... in today's world, emails never truly go missing. But for them to wind up in the hands of Greg Palast is beyond wet-dream territory for me.

The next question: how do we get America's media (and... is it too much to ask... America's congressional committees) to acknowledge what Palast has found, and what Blonde Monica inadvertently admitted?

ellroon said...

We just need to get Palast's work out there... I picked it up from Eschaton comment thread, but I might just drop it back in there.

Blonde Monica indeed! That made me laugh!

/runs off to check out videos on 5/14....

Steve Bates said...

ellroon, I just had a horrible thought... what if the allegedly misdirected emails are really an instance of the kind of Rovean "ratfucking" that brought down Dan Rather?

Palast is always so careful about his sources, but even he might be tempted by such a juicy apple. The awful thing is that no technology can confirm or deny the emails' authenticity: they might well have legitimate headers from an appropriate GOP source. I do hope someone obtains those emails independently. (Perhaps Palast already has; I should not underestimate him.)

ellroon said...

I wouldn't put it past Rove to ink up the waters like the octopus he is. I hope Palast is as smart as he seems to not fall for such a trick.

I got a ho-hum reaction from one thread when I mentioned this. They had heard about this a long while ago, and nothing has been printed, presented as evidence. People want to see the emails themselves.

I have no idea what is up.