Watch the wingnuts go bonkers poohpoohing the judge's ruling on the warrantless wiretapping, smearing the judge and the way the legal opinion was written, rather than addressing this:
the fact that we have a President who breaks the law at will because his administration has adopted the theory that he has the power to do so is surely of far greater importance. Only those with profoundly skewed priorities, or those seeking to find ways to defend the President’s law-breaking, would view that as a close call. Glen Greenwald and 'Harvard Law Professor and constitutional scholar Laurence Tribe' rise in her defense, and also in defense of the legal opinion no matter how it was written. It is the same technique used by Rovian followers. Make enough noise over the details that you can ignore the substance.
Could making people afraid no longer work for Rove? Could it be that people are finally waking up to the true nightmare in the Middle East/ Iraq/ Afghanistan/ Iran/ North Korea/ New Orleans/ economy/ international relations/ civil rights/ environment/ election process/ freedom of=from religion/ medical research?
Gee. Bush says Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Why are we there?
The top ten.
No comments:
Post a Comment