Doing the math

For a better health care system. It wouldn't cost that much, says R. Neal of Looking South. Check the link for his comparisons of American, Canadian, French and British taxes and expenses. Neal concludes:

So, yes, providing universal insurance coverage or universal health care for everyone would cost a little more in taxes, but not that much more. And think of the savings, not to mention peace of mind and security. It seems pretty clear that it would be better than the $2 trillion we spend now that leaves nearly 50 million people behind and gives false hope to the other 250 million who think they are insured until they file a claim.

Thank you. Another blockade destroyed, another hurdle removed. Watch Big Pharma and the Insurance companies build another one...