A few months ago, Seymour Hersh reported that a White House official and Iran Contra alum, Elliot Abrams, had recently led a "lessons learned" discussion about Iran Contra:
Iran-Contra was the subject of an informal “lessons learned” discussion two years ago among veterans of the scandal. Abrams led the discussion. One conclusion was that even though the program was eventually exposed, it had been possible to execute it without telling Congress. As to what the experience taught them, in terms of future covert operations, the participants found: “One, you can’t trust our friends. Two, the C.I.A. has got to be totally out of it. Three, you can’t trust the uniformed military, and four, it’s got to be run out of the Vice-President’s office”—a reference to Cheney’s role, the former senior intelligence official said.
Today the Washington Post reports that the White House may have taken that lesson to heart. It has determined, the Post reports, that in legal disputes between the Congress and the White House over executive privilege, game over, because the White House has decided no US attorney can uphold a contempt of Congress decree:
Bush administration officials unveiled a bold new assertion of executive authority yesterday in the dispute over the firing of nine U.S. attorneys, saying that the Justice Department will never be allowed to pursue contempt charges initiated by Congress against White House officials once the president has invoked executive privilege.
2 comments:
I've heard (Jonathan Turley, maybe?) that Congress can enforce its own contempt declarations, though it hasn't done so since the 1930s. (Would somebody like to research this? I've got a Stellar birthday on my hands in a few minutes...) If that is so, I do hope Ms. Miers packs her toothbrush.
As for Bush's assertion, explain to me again how he (or any president, if it is true) differs from a dictator. I wish Speaker Pelosi would put that damned thing back on the table...
Off to google Congressional contempt charges...
Post a Comment