Sunday, April 29, 2007

Before you can fix what is broken

You have to stop what's breaking it.

SCHOFIELD BARRACKS, Hawaii (AP) -- The Army's new chief of staff says he wants to accelerate by two years a plan to increase the nation's active-duty soldiers by 65,000.

The Army has set 2012 as its target date for a force expansion to 547,000 troops, but Gen. George Casey said Saturday that he has told his staff to have the soldiers ready earlier.

"I said that's too long. Go back and tell me what it would take to get it done faster," he said in an interview with The Associated Press during a stop in Hawaii.

[snip]
A woman in the group asked Casey if her husband's deployments would stop getting longer. She said they used to last for six months in the 1990s but then started lasting nine months and 12 months. Two weeks ago, she heard the Army's announcement that deployments would be extended as long as 15 months.

"Do you honestly foresee this spiral, in effect, stopping?" she asked.

Casey said the Army wants to keep deployments to 15 months, but "I cannot look at you in the eye and guarantee that it would not go beyond."

Defense Secretary Robert Gates in January said he was recommending to the president that the Army boost its active-duty soldiers by 65,000 to 547,000. Casey said about 35,000 of those additional soldiers are already in place.

Gates also recommended that the Marine Corps increase its active-duty force by 27,000 to 202,000.

When people see how this administration treats the wounded and the dead, when they see benefits being cut from the vets, when they see the endless needless war we're entangled in, why on earth would anyone sign up?

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well, they should have to sign up for militia regulation if they want to keep and bear arms, shouldn't they?

ellroon said...

LOL!! What a wonderful idea! Draft all the gun owners....

Steve Bates said...

This is madness. I can barely make it through a 15-month computer contract, and I cannot imagine what it would be like to be in a combat zone for 15 months. As Bryan would probably say, though I'm not presuming to speak for him, that is "not sustainable."

I hate to remind anyone, but if I recall correctly, Barack Obama has called for an increase in the size of the standing army. The only reason I can see for doing that is if one intends to continue entering discretionary wars. In my opinion, the U.S. can be defended with the armed forces we have, if we simply quit invading other countries because a madman decides they need to be invaded. Increasing force levels is merely inviting that madman, or another madman, to invade more countries that have not attacked the U.S.

Is that what we really want?

ellroon said...

The only way we will prevent a total mutiny by our military is to activate the draft. And no blovating gasbag elected official wants to commit political suicide.

And as you say, Steve, calling for more troops won't make it happen, calling for larger armies only lets Bush attack Iran and Syria.

So we're stuck, and our soldiers are dying.

Bring them home.