But the ship has been blocked from unloading the weapons: (my bold)
The Chinese freighter arrived in South Africa last week, and human rights groups and others said they feared the mortar grenades and bullets onboard could be used by President Robert Mugabe's regime to clamp down on its opposition.How dare China horn in on our weapons deals!
A South African group persuaded a judge to bar the weapons from transiting through the country to landlocked Zimbabwe. and the An Yue Jiang then sailed away from South Africa. Private groups and government officials in Mozambique, Angola and Namibia also objected to the weapons, though Namibia said the ship could refuel there if necessary.
[snip]In Washington, the State Department said it was pleased by Tuesday's news from China.
"Right now clearly is not the time that we would want to see anyone putting additional weapons or additional material into this system when the situation is so unsettled and when we have seen real and visible instances of abuses committed by the security forces," deputy spokesman Tom Casey told reporters.
Zimbabwe's government has refused to publish the results of the presidential election held more than three weeks ago, and the opposition says that is part of a ploy to steal the vote. There are reports of increasing violence against the opposition.
China is one of Zimbabwe's main trade partners and allies, and there is no international arms embargo against Zimbabwe. But China's relationship with Mugabe is often pointed to as an example of its willingness to deal with authoritarian regimes in order to secure commodities and markets in Africa.
Although China's global weapons exports are considered tiny in dollar terms, especially compared to the United States, Beijing is a principle exporter of cheap, simple small arms blamed for fueling violence in Sudan and other parts of Africa.
The United States maintained its role as the leading supplier of weapons to the developing world in 2006, followed by Russia and Britain, according to a Congressional study. Pakistan, India and Saudi Arabia were the top buyers.I mean... we have the right and the need to arm people all over the world with the latest weapons! We are the self-declared policeman of the world and we must go fight and conquer those who ... we .. have armed... ah...The global weapons market is highly competitive, with manufacturing countries seeking both to increase profits and to expand political influence through weapons sales to developing nations that reached nearly $28.8 billion in 2006.
Pay no attention to that last statement, tinpot dictators! Especially if you have oil!
2 comments:
Dude, grow up!
It never ceases to amaze me to see how the conduct of the United States is called into question anytime some other country does something. Do you REALLY think your sarcasm is that funny or effective?
Funny or effective? Better than screaming, leaping up and down and pointing, I would think.
It's because so many of our own citizens believe we have God's mandate to go and police the world while being totally unaware of our huge weapons of mass destruction profits. We sell arms to African/Bosnian/Indonesian/Asian/South American countries and then act so surprised when they use them.
And just how many times have we sold weapons to a dictator...Noreiga, Hussein, etc and then declared them rogue states and attacked them?
Because the US seems to think it deserves the spot on the 'Policeman of the World' pedestal, we need to point out the actual facts, the literal truth. We are acting like a rogue nation ourselves.
Sarcasm is one way to do it.
Post a Comment