Thursday, March 22, 2007

It doesn't matter if the banner said 'Bong Hits 4 Jesus'

Or 'Impeach George W. Bush', it is a matter of free speech. It wasn't even on the school campus.

Wikipedia:
Morse v. Frederick is a First Amendment student free speech case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on March 19, 2007. The case involves Joseph Frederick, a then 18-year-old high school senior in Juneau, Alaska, now 24, who was suspended for 10 days after displaying a "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" banner across the street from his high school during the Winter Olympics Torch Relay in 2002.

Wikipedia's background:

In January 2002, students were released from Juneau-Douglas High School to watch the Olympic torch pass by. Frederick, who had not attended school that day, joined some friends on the sidewalk across from the high school (off school grounds). Frederick and his friends waited for the television cameras so they could unfurl a banner reading "Bong Hits 4 Jesus." When they displayed the banner, then-principal Deborah Morse ran across the street and seized it.

Morse initially suspended Joseph Frederick for five days for violating the school district's anti-drug policy, but increased the suspension to 10 days after he refused to give the names of his fellow participants and quoted Thomas Jefferson on free speech.[2] Frederick administratively appealed his suspension to the Superintendent, who denied his appeal but limited it to the time Frederick had already spent out of school prior to his appeal to the Superintendent (eight days). Frederick then appealed to the Juneau School Board, which upheld the suspension on March 19, 2002. On April 25, 2002, Frederick filed a §1983 lawsuit against Morse and the school board in the United States District Court for the District of Alaska claiming they violated his federal and state constitutional rights to free speech.
Kenneth Starr, continuing to put his considerable might behind things that are of vital importance to the nation brings this case before the Supreme Court. He will make it about drugs and dirty hippies, it is really about free speech:
JUNEAU, Alaska - Former Whitewater special counsel Kenneth Starr petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to take up Alaska’s “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” case, a dispute involving a high school student, a banner and a tough school policy.

Starr, who gained national prominence while investigating former President Clinton’s Whitewater land deal and relationship with Monica Lewinsky, filed the petition Monday on behalf of the Juneau School District in response to a March ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Frederick, then a senior, was off school property when he hoisted the banner but was suspended for violating the school’s policy of promoting illegal substances at a school-sanctioned event.

“The principal’s actions were so outrageous, basically leaving school grounds and punishing a student for a message that is not damaging to the school,” said his attorney, Doug Mertz.

Superintendent Peggy Cowan said clarification is needed on the rights of administrators when it comes to disciplinary action of students who break the district’s drug message policy.

“The district’s decision to move forward is not disrespectful to the First Amendment or the rights of students,” she said. “This is an important question about how the First Amendment applies to pro-drug messages in an educational setting.”


If the principal had had a sense of humor and just laughed it off, this would never have become a case. Either way this case goes, students everywhere will continue to challenge the limits of free speech.

Good.

Update: The Washington Post:
When a joke is taken seriously, that's irony, but when it's taken so seriously that the Supreme Court is called upon to determine how future jokes can be made, that's meta-irony. And yet, there it was, a Borat-like moment in the most hallowed of judicial halls: the Morse V. Frederick case. At question in the narrow interpretation: Was it wrong for an Alaska high school principal to tear down her student's banner during an off-campus field trip because it read "Bong Hits 4 Jesus?" And, despite the absurdity of hearing justices parse the minutia of that "sophomoric" prank, what was at stake in the wider scope could not have been more serious: the regulation of free speech within America's public schools.
[snip]
...a more narrow focus on the specifics of this case is necessary to further define what constitutes disruption and free speech. And this is where the oral arguments become really ironic. It appears that because Frederick's banner was a joke, and not a political statement (protected under Tinker V. Des Moines), he might be on shakier ground. The justices seemed to hint that if in the school's mind he was encouraging drug use rather than advocating its legalization, tearing down the banner may have been justified. That is to say, had it read "Vote Yes For Bong Hits" or "Give Pot A Chance" or "Make Marijuana Mandatory," he may have been better protected. However, as one reader noted -- and this case seems to exemplify -- humor and satire that point out absurdity are often vehicles for political statements. Take away students' capacity to mock authority, and you undermine political expression. Protect it, and every class clown will test and push the limits further. Therefore, it would seem no matter which way the Court leans, the joke's on them, and us.
Update 11/6/08:
The Juneau Board of Education has agreed to a settlement in the “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” case that led to a Supreme Court decision in its favor. Under the settlement, former Juneau-Douglas High School student Joseph Frederick will receive a $45,000 payment.

7 comments:

Steve Bates said...

I never meta-irony I didn't like.

Popular speech, speech expressing conventional wisdom, never needs First Amendment protection. That's why people who say things like "I believe in free speech, except for (sex, drugs, rock 'n' roll, Democratic candidates, etc.) are making a profoundly un-American statement. It is the greatest irony that the First Amendment gives them the right to express such folly.

Somehow it seems appropriate that Ken Starr argued this for the government. No one in America is more preoccupied with smut and drugs than he is, not even the regular consumers of smut and drugs. (Wait. Maybe he is among those consumers; I don't know.)

Personally, I thought the students' sign was silly... and as you know my sense of humor, you'll know that's a high compliment. If astringent silliness ceases to be constitutionally protected, I'm in a heap o' trouble.

(Full disclosure: damned right I'm an ACLU member.)

ellroon said...

Sorry for the delay, whig, I have been busy. You may cross post it if that means copying it on your blog. I appreciate the compliment!

If giving me an account means posting on your blog myself, I am honored but no thanks. It would be like painting on someone else's painting, which as an artist I could not do, and besides I am having fun messing up my own blog.

ellroon said...

Thanks for being an ACLU and a Southern Poverty Law Center supporter, Steve! You've done something I've avoided, which is to actually putyour money where your blog is... or something.

Steve Bates said...

ellroon, please consider two things: I've never had children to support, and I'm a technical professional who in years past had a decent income. Being afflicted with a conscience as you are, and blessed with decent resources (I've no idea about yours, and I'm not asking), I feel I had no choice but to help out when I could. ACLU membership is cheap compared to living under fascism, and SPLC membership is a very small price to pay to help stave off the kind of racial hatred that is never far beneath the surface in America. But that's easy for me to say... or at least it was when my bank account was full.

What I regret most is not the depletion of financial resources under the Bush reign, but the decline in my physical abilities. It is hard to regard myself as an activist now that my aching feet no longer admit of my taking to the streets (even for block-walking), and my energy level seldom allows me to do even so simple a thing as phone-banking. Throwing a tiny bit of money and all too few blog posts at the problem is my last-ditch attempt to maintain my street cred as an activist. :)

ellroon said...

Thanks, whig! I appreciate that!

Steve, yes I have kids, and that's where my money goes. I am also very wary of getting involved with any organization because they start by asking for money and then asking for your time....and I'd rather blog.

Sorry to hear about your feet. Does this mean you have marched and protested before now? I rarely have even done that.

So it's nice to see you vetting and trusting these two organizations. Thank God they are there.

Anonymous said...

Thank God that alcohol is legal; it's so harmless.

ellroon said...

Well... Prohibition worked so well....