Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Georgia on my mind

Billmon at the Daily Kos on the fiasco of Georgia and Russia, egged on by the incompetence and thoughtlessness of US politicians:

And so, with an absolute minimum of democratic process, the United States of America committed its full prestige and power (if not, just yet, a legally binding guarantee) to the defense of the two former Soviet republics, even though the Russians have repeatedly stated that they regard NATO membership by either country as a direct threat to their own vital security interests. As others have already noted, this is as if China had unilaterally announced a military alliance with Mexico and Cuba. Actually it’s worse: Imagine the US reaction if China announced a military alliance with Mexico, after which the president of Mexico started dropping public hints about taking New Mexico back – by whatever means necessary. (And if that comparison seems unnecessarily paranoid, consider the history of Russia in the 20th century. Even paranoids have real enemies.)

A careful search of Nexus and Google reveals that the number of stories appearing in the pages of major US newspapers and magazines, or on the wires of major American news services, taking note of this fateful decision, equals exactly one: a brief item out of UPI’s Moscow bureau, warning of the Russian reaction. The Georgian and Ukranian press, on the other hand, gave the new law saturation coverage – encouraged by their respective governments, both of which issued official statements describing their future NATO admissions as, in effect, done deals.

If you have time, read the post. He offers a wealth of background and facts, and works through the tangle of connections and intrigue to present a very clear picture of the recent events.

crossposted at SteveAudio

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

Billmon! I'd missed his voice.

ellroon said...

Hey Mahakal! You look all shiny and new! (ex-Michael, right?)

Billmon sounds depressed which scares the hell out of me, but at least he's warning the world.

I just hope we can survive the neocons' last few months in office. And then we'll need to go after the deep roots of the PNAC and its followers with shovels, pickaxes, and bulldozers.

Otherwise they will rise up and do it all over again in a few years...

Anonymous said...

You can still call me Michael if you like. I haven't changed, it's all a matter of perspective.

ellroon said...

I'll call you whatever you call yourself. You are still you.

Anonymous said...

It's really just a one letter difference anyhow.

Michael=מיכאל

Mahakel=מהכאל

Anonymous said...

For what it's worth, my wife has been calling me "Mahkal" for years.

Anonymous said...

Or "Mahk"... Just how it sounds.

ellroon said...

"Hey You!" works too...

Anonymous said...

Yeah, it would. But she never calls me that. :)

ellroon said...

Lol!

Anonymous said...

Anyhow, call me Mahk if you like, I think that's what my friends should feel comfortable with.

ellroon said...

Mahk it is!